
During World War II, eleven-year-old Felicity is sent from London to Bottlebay, Maine, to live with her grandmother, aunt, uncle, and a reclusive boy who helps her decode mysterious letters that contain the truth about her missing parents.
Publisher:
New York : Arthur A. Levine Books, 2011.
Edition:
1st ed.
ISBN:
9780545215114
0545215110
0545215110
Characteristics:
300 p. ; 20 cm.



Opinion
From the critics

Community Activity
Age
Add Age Suitability
blue_dog_2741
Aug 13, 2013
blue_dog_2741 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 10 and 17
red_butterfly_1949
Jul 31, 2013
red_butterfly_1949 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 10 and 15
b
BlueBookLover
Jul 11, 2013
BlueBookLover thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 11 and 14
u
UnbreakableValour
Oct 11, 2012
UnbreakableValour thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 10 and 13
Quotes
Add a Quotev
violet_butterfly_2829
Jun 02, 2016
"You're smart , I see."-Phobe Stone , The Romeo and Juliet Code.

Comment
Add a CommentThis book was one of the best books I've ever read .my second favorite book. I loved it so much I'm craving for the next book.
This book was overall a good book, but in the beginning it was a bit slow but once you get into it it's pretty good.
I loved this book. I've read it about 3 times because i love it so much.
I love this book!!!!!!! It worth reading .
This book had many twists but that was part of what made it enjoyable.!!
It was better than I was expecting.
The storyline is great! Nice plot. I really liked thebeggining because it was adventurous and thrilling. Eventually, I found myself skimming and slipping out of my "book world." Once it got closer to the end, I felt like I was starting to regrip the book, but alas, I was already lost.
A pretty good book. I think that the British terms were kind of annoying (no offence).
what do I think? there is no word to descibe it...read it urself, then u'll see what I mean, hopefully.
A very strange little novel that is neither fish nor fowl. Problems include the passive protagonist and the odd speech patterns that attempt to be historically accurate but feel as if the writer is trying too hard (at last count there are thirty-seven times in this book that Flissy says "ever so"). Dig deep enough down into The Romeo and Juliet Code and I think you could find characters and ideas worth exploring. It’s a pity all of that is buried beneath a style that hurts rather than helps. The book will find its audience, there is little doubt. Enjoying it, however, will have to be taken on a case-by-case basis.